Not-So-Passionate about Passion Voting


A Small Change to Avoid Big Mistakes from Groupthink

by Beth Skorochod, CollaborateUp's Director of Practice


The meeting is the most fundamental form of human collaboration. You really can’t get anything significant done that involves more than one person without a meeting at some point. But meetings are tricky; they can become an utter waste of time before you even realize it, veering quickly from purposeful discussion into sucksville.


The good news is meeting don’t have to suck. With a few stalwart facilitation skills, you can take a meeting from an energy-sapping waste of time to something productive, with decisive, actionable outcomes.
One of the biggest pitfalls in a meeting can be the desire for consensus. While agreement on key decisions can be necessary, too often meetings devolve into irrational conformity without debate or discussion.
There’s a quick and easy process we use at CollaborateUp to short-circuit this groupthink and still get varying input and perspective from participants. While it doesn’t have a branded name, it’s the “non-passion vote.” In passion voting, participants assess the ideas or concepts scribbled on sticky notes clinging to the nearest flat surface, then vote with stickers or tick marks on those they are most passionate about. The problem here, is that these public votes are like dominoes, they tend to follow the ones before, clustering votes according to the early voters rather than the way participants actually feel. No one wants to vote for a concept that no one else has chosen.


How does ‘non-passion voting’ work?

  • Start by setting the terms of the vote:

    • What are they voting on? What they think is of greatest impact/ROI? What they themselves want to do? What they think is most feasible?

    • Be transparent about the impact of the vote: is it a democratic vote and the outcome will determine next steps? Is it a poll that decision-makers will take into account but aren’t bound by? Something in between?

  • Then number the ideas or concepts that participants need to rank or vote on

  • Ask participants to take a few minutes to review the concepts, then silently write down the number or numbers that correspond to the ideas they feel most meet the terms of the vote

  • The facilitator tallies these anonymous votes and reveals the winner or winners

  • The ‘winner’ may be the idea that moves forward, or it may not be. Depending on who is the ultimate decision maker, that person may choose to respect the votes or not. Either way, everyone’s authentic voice was heard.

Easy peasy.


While not perfect, this voting style is fast and is likely better than the outcomes of doing it the old way.  This works because it gives people some quiet time to review and think about the ideas. Silently writing down your votes ensures that you won’t be swayed when someone you respect votes for something else, or that you won’t change your mind when you realize no one voted for the idea that you love.
Try it out in your next meeting and see how it works for you.

Tackling 3 Myths Around Cost-Plus Contracting from our CEO and More >
Four Tips for Unlocking Creativity without Short-Circuiting Your Brain from our More >
  A Small Change to Avoid Big Mistakes from Groupthink by More >
Top Tips on Engaging Stakeholders from a Corporate Sustainability Pro Jessica More >
Extremely practical and extremely easy to implement once you have an understanding of the steps and the formula and the requirements of the process. - CollaborateUp Academy Participant
"The CollaborateUp Workshop gave our delegates a set of tools they can use immediately to collaborate more effectively across multiple departments and organizations." - Erika Lopez, Global Impact
“Even with a diverse set of stakeholders and a very limited timeframe, the CollaborateUp Formula allowed us cut through a complex set of issues and develop a concrete and pragmatic proposal for tackling a very tough problem. Richard Crespin is exactly what you want in a facilitator, someone able to bring people together to recognize their shared goals and the best ways to achieve them.” - Amit Ronen Director, George Washington University Solar Institute
The course was great! Great value and great insights into collaborating with various partners in multiple situations. It really change my thought process and how I view situations with our clients and stakeholders. - CollaborateUp Academy Participant
I soon discovered that it doesn’t really matter whether your introduction to CollaborateUp is through an issue solving workshop, or at an event as Richard brings all the chaos together with his savvy charm and good humour - the most important thing is that you get to engage and work with these great folks! My biggest take out over the past five years of being a part of their world – collaboration is a process and you’re not going to get very far unless you know what problem you’re all trying to solve together. The CollaborateUp framework helps by asking simple questions to help reveal the big answers. - Cate O’Kane, Founder, &co partnership consultancy
The course actually aids with more than just collaboration - it helps drive thinking into issue clarification, meeting handling and setting up, communicating with stakeholders. I loved it! - CollaborateUp Academy Participant
"Building up the capacity and capability of nonprofits to make a difference in the world is a core part of the Office Depot Foundation's mission. CollaborateUp had a really big impact on the nonprofits we support, giving them tools and insights they can use immediately." - Mary Wong